Current:Home > NewsWisconsin lawmakers OK bill to tackle forever chemicals pollution, but governor isn’t on board -RiskWatch
Wisconsin lawmakers OK bill to tackle forever chemicals pollution, but governor isn’t on board
View
Date:2025-04-15 15:25:50
MADISON, Wis. (AP) — The Wisconsin state Assembly passed a bill Thursday that would unlock $125 million to help municipalities and landowners cope with pollution from so-called forever chemicals. But Gov. Tony Evers isn’t on board.
The Senate passed the Republican-authored legislation in November. The Assembly followed suit with a 61-35 vote on Thursday, the chamber’s last floor period of the two-year legislative session.
PFAS, short for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances, are man-made chemicals that don’t easily break down in nature. They are found in a wide range of products, including cookware and stain-resistant clothing, and previously were often used in aviation fire-suppression foam. The chemicals have been linked to health problems including low birth weight, cancer and liver disease, and have been shown to make vaccines less effective.
Municipalities across Wisconsin are struggling with PFAS contamination in groundwater, including Marinette, Madison, Wausau and the town of Campbell on French Island. The waters of Green Bay also are contaminated.
The bill would create grants for cities, towns, villages, private landowners and waste disposal facilities to test for PFAS in water treatment plants and wells and mandate studies on the chemicals. The bill doesn’t appropriate any money but the measure’s chief sponsors, Sens. Eric Wimberger and Rob Cowles and Rep. Jeffrey Mursau, have said the dollars would come out of a $125 million PFAS trust fund established in the current state budget.
But Evers has balked at the bill largely because it contains provisions that he says would limit the state Department of Natural Resources’ ability to hold polluters accountable.
Under the bill, the DNR would need landowners’ permission to test their water for PFAS and couldn’t take any enforcement action against landowners who spread PFAS in compliance with a license or permit.
The agency would be responsible for remediation at contaminated sites where the responsible party is unknown or can’t pay for the work. And landowners who allow the DNR to remediate contaminated property at the state’s expense would be immune from enforcement action.
Evers in December directed the DNR to ask the Legislature’s Republican-controlled finance committee to release the $125 million trust fund to the agency but Republicans continued to push the bill as a framework to spend the money.
The governor sent Wimberger and Cowles a letter Wednesday signaling he won’t sign the legislation into law. With the Assembly wrapping up Thursday, there was no time to revise the bill. Unless Evers changes his mind, the measure is dead.
Assembly Democrats accused Republicans of refusing to compromise and lamented the Legislature’s inability to make any substantial headway on PFAS.
“What’s more disappointing and more unfair is the people who have been waiting for years for the Legislature to get their act together,” Rep. Katrina Shankland said. “How many sessions is it going to take to get something real done on PFAS? I don’t know. I don’t have the answer ... square one tomorrow, I guess.”
Mursau countered that the DNR restrictions are necessary to ensure the agency doesn’t hold landowners liable for pollution on their property that they didn’t cause. Rep. Rob Swearingen pressed Evers to change his stance and sign the bill.
“We’ve got to stop playing these games on (the bill) and PFAS contamination,” he said.
veryGood! (932)
Related
- The Best Stocking Stuffers Under $25
- 'Survivor' Season 47, Episode 3: Who was voted out during this week's drama-filled episode?
- Last call at 4 a.m. in California? Governor says yes for one private club in LA Clippers’ new arena
- Messi collects 46th trophy as Inter Miami wins MLS Supporters' Shield
- Working Well: When holidays present rude customers, taking breaks and the high road preserve peace
- Aphrodisiacs are known for improving sex drive. But do they actually work?
- Spam alert: How to spot crooks trying to steal money via email
- Residents of landslide-stricken city in California to get financial help
- Current, future North Carolina governor’s challenge of power
- Amazon Prime Big Deal Days 2024: What to know about the sales event and preview of deals
Ranking
- California DMV apologizes for license plate that some say mocks Oct. 7 attack on Israel
- Tropical Storm Leslie forms in the Atlantic and is expected to become a hurricane
- Karl-Anthony Towns says goodbye to Minnesota as Timberwolves-Knicks trade becomes official
- Detroit Lions fan wins $500,000 on football-themed scratch-off game after skipping trip
- SFO's new sensory room helps neurodivergent travelers fight flying jitters
- Dakota Fanning opens up about the pitfalls of child stardom, adapting Paris Hilton's memoir
- 1000-Lb. Sisters’ Amy Slaton Breaks Down in Tears Over Michael Halterman Split
- Love Is Blind's Hannah Reveals Her True Thoughts on Leo's Shouting Match
Recommendation
Paula Abdul settles lawsuit with former 'So You Think You Can Dance' co
PFF adds an in-game grading feature to its NFL analysis
Outer Banks’ Madelyn Cline Seemingly Confirms Kiara and JJ’s Relationship Status in Season 4
BioLab fire: Shelter-in-place continues; Atlanta residents may soon smell chlorine
McKinsey to pay $650 million after advising opioid maker on how to 'turbocharge' sales
These Designer Michael Kors Handbags Are All Under $100 & Been Quietly Put on Sale With an Extra 20% Off
The Grammys’ voting body is more diverse, with 66% new members. What does it mean for the awards?
Why The Bear’s Joel McHale Really, Really Likes Knives